Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Effective Collaborative Strategies Essay Paper
FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Criteria for Success: You will begin work on your group project this week as you:
Identify a goal.
Establish the members of your group.
Define the roles and responsibilities of each group member.
You will work toward your goal over the next two weeks and reflect on the collaborative strategies used in your final assessment document during Week 6.
Click here to review the assignment for Week 6.
What to submit/deliverables: A completed Group Project Plan.
What you need to complete this assignment: To complete this assignment, you will need the following resources:
Assignment Overview Video.
Group Project Plan document.
Steps to Complete: In Week 4, complete and submit your assignment in Blackboard using the following steps:
STEP 1: Identify a common measurable goal. This can be a goal you are already working on at work, at school, or at home. You should be able to accomplish this goal within two weeks (or a sub-goal if you are working on a longer-term goal) during Weeks 4 and 5 of this course.
Here are some examples of common goals you may decide to work on:
Organizing a room in a home or apartment.
Cooking a new dish or elaborate meal.
Creating an art project (e.g., mural, sculpture, drawing, etc.).
Putting together a crowdfunding idea.
A project at work you have to complete.
A virtual party or get together.
Planning a safe social event.
A health or fitness goal.
A plan for staying connected with someone.
An environmental clean-up project in your community.
Volunteer efforts such as a book drive, food drive, etc.
STEP 2: Identify the other 2–4 members of your group and how you will work together. You may work with family members, friends, classmates, co-workers, or anyone else you will be able to collaborate with during this time period. Collaboration can be accomplished in-person, on the phone, through a virtual meeting space like Zoom, or through other collaborative tools like Google Docs. Make a plan for how your team will collaborate and what each person’s role and responsibilities will be.
STEP 3: Download the Group Project Plan Document and complete all sections.
STEP 4: Upload the completed document to the Assignment 2 link in Week 4 of Blackboard.
Grading for this assignment will be based on the following rubric found here:
Week 4 Assignment 2 Overview |
Instructions
Make sure to read the detailed instructions and the scoring guide (rubric) for Assignment 2: Group Project Plan.
To submit your assignment, please go to Assignment 2 in Blackboard by clicking the Assignment 2 link above.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Effective Collaborative Strategies Essay Paper |
Effective Collaborative Strategies Essay Paper