Environmental Science Federal Disaster Declaration Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Environmental Science Federal Disaster Declaration Discussion
Federal Disaster Declaration
Name and describe the different types of disaster declarations and the requirements that must be met.
Also, discuss the declaration process, from the initial impact of the disaster up to the federal government
designating the disaster a Presidential Disaster Declaration. Finally, describe the available assistance
under each of the different types of the disaster.
Material and research must be derived from the reading material (textbook and provided supplemental
documents). This assignment must meet a minimum of 2450 words (not counting title and reference
page), in an APA Essay Style Format using – Times New Roman, 12 font size, with 1’’ margins using line
spacing of 1.5’’ (APA style citation). Cite the source whenever using a borrowed idea from the text (author,
year, page #).
Textbook: McEntire, David A. (2015). Disaster Response and Recovery: Strategies and Tactics for
Resilience, 2nd Edition.
Supplemental Documents (all free electronic formats):
- Robert T Stafford Act Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance
- National Response Framework, 4th Edition
- National Disaster Recovery Framework
- Planning Considerations for Disaster Housing
- 2017 Hurricane Season FEMA After-Action Report
- Environmental Science Federal Disaster Declaration Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow