Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Prepare for the Open Forum Reflection Paper Essay by thinking about the information we’ve covered so far in this semester.
Consider anything you found interesting, surprising, or perplexing in the last week. What did you discover that changed your perspective on a problem? What habits, methods, or resources did you come across that helped you finish your course work more effectively or efficiently? To back up your claim, can you provide specific examples and details?
Write: In this discussion forum, you can explore themes that interest you, share crucial insights and issues that you’re working on, share your struggles and victories, and debate difficulties that have emerged this week, with the goal of finding solutions. Your postings should describe your experiences from this week’s class and serve as a springboard for future conversation. At least one of the following questions should be addressed: What struck you as you investigated the course materials this week?
How do you think you’ll use this knowledge in the future?
What discoveries have you made?
What have you been having trouble with?
What are the questions that have arisen for you at this point?
What useful tidbits did you pick up from this or a previous course?
What are some of your questions concerning the task that you think your classmates might be able to answer? (If you have a question for the instructor, please contact them by email or Canvas messaging.) This week, you must post at least 100 words in total on this thread. You can publish once or ten times; the only requirements are that you write at least 100 words in total and participate in course-related conversation. Ask questions, respond to inquiries, share other resources you find useful, or engage in a discussion about something you learned this week.
Give a thorough explanation of the concerns you raise in your blog entries. If you mention that you had trouble finding sources for your annotated bibliography, specify what part of the process you were having trouble with. Was it considering search terms? Have you found too many sources that aren’t relevant to your topic as a result of your search? Is it possible that your search yielded too few results? Did you have any trouble locating reliable sources? Prepare for the Open Forum Reflection Paper Essay by thinking about the information we’ve covered so far in this semester.
Consider anything you found interesting, surprising, or perplexing in the last week. What did you discover that changed your perspective on a problem? What habits, methods, or resources did you come across that helped you finish your course work more effectively or efficiently? To back up your claim, can you provide specific examples and details?
Write: In this discussion forum, you can explore themes that interest you, share crucial insights and issues that you’re working on, share your struggles and victories, and debate difficulties that have emerged this week, with the goal of finding solutions. Your postings should describe your experiences from this week’s class and serve as a springboard for future conversation. At least one of the following questions should be addressed: What struck you as you investigated the course materials this week?
How do you think you’ll use this knowledge in the future?
What discoveries have you made?
What have you been having trouble with?
What are the questions that have arisen for you at this point?
What useful tidbits did you pick up from this or a previous course?
What are some of your questions concerning the task that you think your classmates might be able to answer? (If you have a question for the instructor, please contact them by email or Canvas messaging.) This week, you must post at least 100 words in total on this thread. You can publish once or ten times; the only requirements are that you write at least 100 words in total and participate in course-related conversation. Ask questions, respond to inquiries, share other resources you find useful, or engage in a discussion about something you learned this week.
Give a thorough explanation of the concerns you raise in your blog entries. If you mention that you had trouble finding sources for your annotated bibliography, specify what part of the process you were having trouble with. Was it considering search terms? Have you found too many sources that aren’t relevant to your topic as a result of your search? Is it possible that your search yielded too few results? Did you have any trouble locating reliable sources?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Essay on Open Forum Reflection