ETHICAL VIGNETTE DUTY TO WARN
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
ETHICAL VIGNETTE DUTY TO WARN
Description
Overview
Ethical vignettes discuss relevant topics to the counseling field, seeking to apply ethical decision-making strategies to real-world issues by presenting a case study that challenges ethical principles. This assignment is based on a video that presents an ethical vignette focused on liability issues related to the Duty to Warn. After watching the video, you will then complete a response paper that details the decision process you would consider based on your understanding of applicable ethics codes.
Instructions
· Watch the video titled Duty to Warn.
· Write a 24-page response paper.
· Summarize the major points of the ethical issue presented in the video.
· Summarize and apply NEW YORK state boards rules and regulations related to the topic.
· Clearly identify the applicable ACA/ASCA codes.
· Respond by reflecting on a personal exploration of the ethical themes of the vignette and summarizing your reaction.
· Describe what you learned from this ethical vignette case and discuss a strategy for applying appropriate ethical decision making in a similar situation to your future practice as a school counselor.
· The paper must include at least 2 references from scholarly sources less than 5 years old.
· The paper must also include the web address for your states ethics code within the references.
· The paper must include at least two citations.
· The paper must be in current APA format.
ETHICAL VIGNETTE DUTY TO WARN
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow ETHICAL VIGNETTE DUTY TO WARN
ETHICAL VIGNETTE DUTY TO WARN