EVSP411 Environmental Policy, Regulation, and law

EVSP411 Environmental Policy, Regulation, and law

Instructions:

EVSP411 Environmental Policy, Regulation, and law

Assignment Title (make it descriptive so the reader knows what they are reading)

Student Name

University Name

EVSP411 Environmental Policy, Regulation, and law

Professor Name

Date

University Plagiarism Policy: The University System supports and promotes academic honesty and personal integrity. Any form of academic dishonesty has no place in higher education. The University System does not tolerate dishonest efforts by its students. Students who are guilty of academic dishonesty can expect to be penalized. Any student who knowingly assists another student in dishonest behavior is equally responsible. An additional violation of the standards of academic honesty within a course may result in dismissal from the University System.

Running head: BRIEF TITLE OF PAPER 1

4

Repeat Title Here

Begin text under the title and go right into the paper. Indent paragraphs. Use section titles or numbers to differentiate between multiple questions; especially on the mid-term and final assessment. Review APA style on formatting first level headings (e.g., center bold, title case capitalization – this does not mean all caps), second level headings (e.g., flush left, bold, title case capitalization), etc.

There is no minimum or maximum writing requirement. Directions usually state “thoroughly explain or discuss”. This equates to roughly 1.5 – 2 pages per assignment. There is no penalty for writing more than 2 pages. However, assignments less than 1.5 pages tend to have points deducted for not being sufficiently detailed, though in part this depends on student writing style. Also, remember to cite in APA format within the text as well as the reference page that follows.

BRIEF TITLE OF PAPER 2

Do not change this font. It is to be Times Roman Numeral 12 throughout the paper and including references. .

References

Start the reference list here on a separate page… use APA style

Devine, J. (2014, June 30). Testing the waters 2014: A guide to water quality at vacation beaches. New York, NY: Natural Resources Defense Council. Retrieved from https://www.nrdc.org/resources/testing-waters-2014-guide-water-quality-vacation-beaches

Fiorino, D. J. (2006). The new environmental regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Knotts, J. (1999, Winter). A brief history of drinking water regulations. On Tap: Drinking Water News For America’s Small Communities, 8(4), 1. Retrieved from http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/ndwc/pdf/OT/OTw99.pdf

National Pollution Prevention Roundtable. (2003, January). An ounce of pollution prevention is worth over 167 billion* pounds of cure: A decade of pollution prevention results 1990 – 2000. Washington, D.C.: Author.

Natural Resources Defense Council [NRDC]. (2016). Water: Water pollution. Retrieved from https://www.nrdc.org/issues/water-pollution#priority-what-you-do

Sullivan, T. F. P (Ed). (1995). Environmental law handbook. Rockville, MD: Government Institutions, Inc.

Surfrider Foundation. (n.d.). Blue Water Task Force. Retrieved from http://www.surfrider.org/blue-water-task-force%20

U.S. Department of Commerce. (1988, March). Year of the ocean: Discussion papers. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/nscep

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. (n.d.). Pollution prevention (P2). Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/p2

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow EVSP411 Environmental Policy, Regulation, and law

EVSP411 Environmental Policy, Regulation, and law

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!