Guideline for Northouse Case Studies
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Guideline for Northouse Case Studies
Description
Assignment Guideline for Northouse 8th ed. Case Studies
For this assignment, you will write a reflection paper on the assigned case study from Northouse 8th edition. Page 155, case 5.2
Here are the guideline:
· Read the case very carefully.
· Use the three or four questions at the bottom (as a guide only) to write your paper.
· Please do not just answer the questions. You are expected to add your reflection, thoughts, and opinions on the subject.
· Do not copy (or cut and paste) the questions onto your paper. Marks will be deducted if you do that.
Assignment Guidelines
· Minimum 2 pages, double-spaced.
· Must be APA7. Make sure to use correct APA in-text citations for paraphrased ideas and quoted text.
· Citations: Please cite page numbers if you are using quotes (remember that I want to see your understanding of the quote, not just the quote use quotes minimally. Marks will be deducted for lack of citations (at least 1 citation per page).
· References: You must use Northouse as your primary reference for this assignment.
Guideline for Northouse Case Studies
Guideline for Northouse Case Studies
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Guideline for Northouse Case Studies