HA 415 Health Care and Medicine Policies Essay

October 22, 2022

HA 415 Health Care and Medicine Policies Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

HA 415 Health Care and Medicine Policies Essay

Criterion 1: Health care Policies

● Visual depiction includes how ideas become healthcare policy on all three levels (local, state and national).


Criterion 2: Individuals and Groups	● Visual depiction identifies how at least two individuals and two groups can impact the health care policy process. ● Depiction analyzes specific roles that individuals/groups may play in health care policy design.

Criteria 3
Criterion 3: Policy and Nursing Homes	Visual depiction illustrates at least three ways in which the health policy process impacts the nursing home industry.


Criterion 4: Writing Requirements	All of the following elements are met: ● Displays college-level writing in Standard English free of spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors. ● Minimal in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may occur. ● Minimal paper formatting errors such as a misplaced margin may occur. ● Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear. ● Assignment is 3-4 pages in length not including the title page and reference page.


Criterion 5: Academic references with in-text citations.	Includes three academic references from multiple outside sources and/or course materials as required.


HA415_1904B_-3.1: Distinguishing the role of the local, state and national policy makers.	The student thoroughly and clearly distinguishes the role of the local, state and national policy makers.

Risks in Healthcare Clinical Projects Essay

Identify five common risks in healthcare clinical projects, and develop contingency responses for each.

Accountability is one common risk in healthcare clinical projects because if a team member does not do their part then that can negatively affect everything and everyone else in the project. A contingency plan for this risk is using a chart that was presented in our book called RASIC. It stands for responsible, approval, support, informed, and consult, this chart lists “all project team members’ roles for each task in a project” (McLaughlin, Olson 112).

Time is another risk in healthcare clinical projects because if time frames aren’t assigned then it can cause delays and setting the whole project back. A contingency plan for this risk is using the PERT estimating system. This system helps in “knowing when a task should have started and whether the project is ahead of or behind schedule” (McLaughlin, Olson 115), this system is most helpful when it comes to a lot of project tasks

Technology Failure is also a risk in healthcare clinical projects because technology is bound to be used and it is also bound to crash and fail at wrong times. A contingency plan for this risk is having an IT employee on standby so that if issues arise then they are fixed quickly. Also if data is being inputted in a device then make sure that device is backed up or that you have paper copies of the data on hand.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met