Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
History of Digital Culture and Evolution of Technology
In your #group-collaboration-channel on Slack post and respond to the following:
write a reply for this
The telegraph changed all of this and gave newspaper the ability to report news very quickly and with a sense of timeliness. It revolutionized the newspaper business and allowed them tremendous growth opportunities. They sometimes would update news stories and publish four editions in a day as an example just to satiate the public’s curiosity about how stories were unfolding.
The Week 6 lecture and how it relates to journalism describes almost the exact opposite approach. As more and more news are gathered and the newspapers become acquired by conglomerates the local newspapers have been folding. There is a need for local news, but the advertising stream that was a source of revenue has dried up. In its place is the digital papers which can be updated quickly without running the printing presses and delivering hard copy papers. Many people have decided to write on blogs, social media, and create podcasts who didn’t go to journalism school and took up this endeavor themselves.
This is where the DIY culture that is represented in the mixtape and garage bands lecture emanates from with a sense of self-reliance to create space for their own views and reach others on new platforms. Matt Murray, editor in chief of the Wall Street Journal, provided many examples of this as he answered our questions in the synchronous session last week which I listened to over the weekend.
He went into detail about fairness and trust issues, the similarities between Ray Bradbury’s short story, “The Velt,” and Mark Zuckerberg’s Metaverse, and about the high barrier of entry for anyone to get into the newspaper business pre-digital. Of course, all of this is changing moment to moment as the world evolves.2. In understanding technology changes in a microchip and microprocessor world that is made up of binary code there isn’t a good or bad limit, but simply a change in the function of a tool to fit the needs of a situation.
The example that was given in the podcast was about watches in the pre-Quartz days that had one function to deliver. If someone wanted something else, they had to buy another product. The wristwatch could not be a stop watch, a calculator, a phone, and camera, a radio or any of the myriad things that the Apple watch can do now. As it is called an artifact it can be whatever is appropriate for its particular needs of the moment. This is truly transformational, and it is neither good nor bad just different artifacts for different time periods based on technology that is binary now.
I was thinking of the Osnos Roam speaker which you take with you, and it allows you to stream radio, listen to playlists, answer a phone call, or use as an intercom system in your house. More innovative artifacts are on the drawing board that we cannot even imagine yet that will be products that will change how we live day by day. It was interesting to think of the similarities between the 19th and the 20th century with the range of experimentation that resulted in creating viable products that went on to being marketed to the mass consumer audience.
History of Digital Culture and Evolution of Technology
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
History of Digital Culture and Evolution of Technology |
History of Digital Culture and Evolution of Technology