Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Individually examining a previously published research article
Individually examining a previously published research article
Part I: The Research Question, the Purpose, the Variables, and the Subjects
Question for Research
Clearly and succinctly expresses your group’s study topic in PICO style.
Does therapy help children with autism spectrum disorder enhance social behavior when compared to no therapy? is the research question.
The Study’s Objectives
Describe the study’s purpose/aim as stated by the author in the article: may be clipped and pasted
DO NOT alter or amend the article’s purpose statement.
Variables
Identify study variables based on the Purpose of Study indicated above.
Descriptive, Qualitative Study: Variables of Interest OR Quantitative Study: Dependent & Independent Variables
Participants
Recruiting/enrolling eligible people in the study: How did they recruit/enroll eligible participants in the study?
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Describe the criteria for inclusion and exclusion.
Total Numbers of Participants: The total number of people who took part in the study.
Part II: Intervention and Information Obtaining Procedures
Quantitative Research
Group for Intervention/Treatment
Describe the contents of the intervention offered to the Intervention group.
Describe how the materials were distributed to the Intervention group.
Identify the individual who gave the Intervention group the Intervention content.
If there is a Control Group in the study, it should be used.
Describe the contents of the Control group’s package.
Explain how the contents were distributed to the Control group.
Identify the individual who gave the Control group with the content.
OR
Obtaining Information for a Descriptive/Qualitative Study
Describe the procedure for gathering information/data in detail (e.g., making an appointment to meet each participant, visiting their home/meeting in a clinical facility, etc.).
Part III: Procedures for Data Collection and Measurement Tools/Instruments
Describe in detail ALL data collection procedures (interview, survey, observation, etc.).
Describe in detail each measurement tool/instrument utilized to measure/assess the study’s findings.
Part IV: Findings/Results
Characteristics of Participants/Sociodemographic Findings
Describe the characteristics or sociodemographic status of the participants.
Objectivity, descriptiveness, and comprehensiveness are required.
Describe the results of the Tables/Figures in order to provide thorough information about participant characteristics, as described in the article.
Findings/Results of the Research
Describe ALL Other Results/Findings in detail, except the following participant characteristics.
Each result item must feature the same headers and subheadings as the article.
Don’t just mention “pain level was reduced,” “adherence was increased”…
etc
INCLUDE NOTHING FROM THE DISCUSSION AND/OR THE CONCLUSION IN THE ARTICLE.
Part V: Findings Synthesis
Findings Synthesis
Describe the rationale/mechanism for how/why you did what you did. The discovery of each intervention/factor contributes to the answer to your Research Question (e.g., how does music therapy improve pain, how does sucking stimulation boost oral intake in pre-term infants).
Should not reuse content from the Findings section and/or article.
For the above-mentioned rationale/mechanism, citations from other sources (e.g. textbooks, CDC, etc.) may be included.
Implications for Nursing
Describe how nurses can put the research findings into practice.
Individually examining a previously published research article
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Individually examining a previously published research article |
Individually examining a previously published research article