Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
NEED TOTAL 4 to 5 Pages on TIMES NEW ROMAN FORMAT PLEAASE
don’t use any U.K based peer reviewed papers
internal use of references we need to submit
peer reviewed papers must be from very recent
Need 8 peer reviewed papers
while writing paper please provide some headings, introduction and conclusion please.
In correct APA7 format, write the reference of the article .
clearly state what the article is about and its purpose.
describe how you will use it in your upcoming assignment.
repeat for a total of eight(8) peer- reviewed sources.
reading : Gamble et al.(6th ed.)
Corporate Strategy: Diversification and the Multi-business company
Ethics, Corporate social responsibility, Environmental Sustainability, and strategy.
A five Forces Analysis
A list of industry driving forces and key success factors.
A SWOT analysis and financial analysis for Google’s performance between 2009 and 2019.
also please recommended strategies necessary to allow google to strengthen its lead in the search industry and to make a success:
its smartphone business
cloud computing
Entry into emerging markets
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |