Literature Review section
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
159
MODULE7
Literature Review section
Prepare the Discussion section of your paper. Submit the entire document. However, only the discussion section will be graded in this module. The discussion section should contain two to five
paragraphs and should be a discussion of how the literature review impacts your topic. Go back to your thesis statement and be sure to apply your literature review to your thesis statement clearly.
This is where you might choose to add practice examples.
The discussion section of your paper will start after your Literature Review section. Before submitting, insure your references are on a separate reference page and Annotated Bib. Starts on a
separate page!
This is a good week to start reviewing the comments from previous papers and start correcting if you have not already done so. The discussion is your own words supported by the literature (this
means citing). If you refer to your practice setting make sure you avoid first person and contractions. The discussion should be at least 2-5 paragraphs. A well-developed paragraph should include
at least 3 sentences!
Discussion Question:
Please provide two suggestions, from the assigned reading materials and/or outside sources, for overcoming writer’s block. Also, provide three suggestions that you use to handle writer’s block.
Which of these has been most successful for you?
Literature Review section
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Literature Review section