Professional Development Plan for Plant Pathology Meeting
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
160 Professional Development Plan for Plant Pathology Meeting
1- Professional Development Plan for Plant Pathology Meeting (500-word limit)
Briefly describe your plan to make the most of your time at the meeting.
- How will you choose and capitalize on networking opportunities?
- How will you make contacts and appointments before the meeting?
- How will you choose the above contacts?
- What 10 keywords would you use to search the meeting program?
2-Tapping into Graduate Student Creativity:
This section is split into two sub-sections, both of which are designed to allow graduate students to showcase their creativity in soft skills such as fundraising and public outreach.
Part 1: Foundation Fundraising/ Generation of New Donors (250-word limit)
- Propose an initiative to either raise additional funds for Foundation, to attract new donors from within membership, or to attract new donors from outside membership. Describe how someone could contribute to the above effort, insure its success, or enlist others to help. If Foundation implements your idea, you’ll be offered a role in leading it, but your selection is not contingent on accepting the offer.
- Creativity/ originality of idea.
- Potential for success and evidence in support.
Part 2: Community Engagement (250-word limit)
- Propose an idea for how to engage and communicate with your local community about topics in plant pathology. What is a way that you can generate interest about a specific topic with the general public?
- Creativity/ originality of idea.
- Potential for success and evidence in support.
Professional Development Plan for Plant Pathology Meeting
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Professional Development Plan for Plant Pathology Meeting