Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Market Size Dictate Outcomes in Sports Discussion
Directly Addresses Discussion PromptRather than simply writing 300 words (500 for graduate students) on the general topic, the post should directly answer the question posed. |
|
2.0 pts | ||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoherent Structure and OrganizationA fully developed response that uses a clear thesis statement, is well organized, and has a logical structure: Introduction, Development, and Conclusion.
Market Size Dictate Outcomes in Sports Discussion |
|
2.0 pts | ||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality and Critical ThinkingResponse demonstrates critical thinking and offers original ideas/conclusions/insights. Evidence of additional thinking and originality beyond concepts and examples introduced in course material. |
|
2.0 pts | ||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Course Concepts and MaterialsEngages, uses appropriately, and cites appropriately, the relevant concepts, theories, and information drawn from course lectures, readings, and videos. The citation of the course material should be a mixture of direct quotation and paraphrasing. |
|
2.0 pts | ||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Additional ResearchResponse builds upon existing knowledge from course material by finding quality, relevant, and original references/sources to offer new insights on the topic. The citation of the additional research should be a mixture of direct quotation and paraphrasing.
Market Size Dictate Outcomes in Sports Discussion 98 |
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Market Size Dictate Outcomes in Sports Discussion