Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
I have identified and secured the participation of the following academic (at least two) and professional (at least two) individuals and/or teams to form the basis of my network. This network will help me to clarify my vision for success and will help guide me now and in the future.
Directions: Complete the information below for each member of your network. For more than four entries repeat the items below with details of your additional network member(s) in the ADDITIONAL NETWORK MEMBERS section.
Introduction- Resource persons are always a part of any and every successful learning process and work experience. In my career as a nurse, I have somewhat relied on the contributions of a few resource persons in making adjustments. Resource persons were also useful to me in my learning experiences during my BSN program. In this program, I have a couple of professionals who can help to achieve my academic and career goals.
NETWORK MEMBER 1
Name:
Title:
Organization:
Academic or Professional: Academic
Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse:
Notes:
I see Crystal as an individual who is a part of my support and success in the pursuit of my graduate scholar program at University. Crystal is a very patient, encouraging, and deeply passionate individual. Crystal has an open-door policy and is
just a telephone away and this makes her so outstanding in doing her enrollment job. Crystal delivers her duty so well to agree with all the missions and visions of University, and her work ethic has inspired me to be a part of the success. Right
from the beginning of my enrolment into University, Crystal has been so supportive, encouraging, and even guided me through the resources and portals on the website. The most amazing part is the way she follows up and checks on me to make sure that I do not miss anything before the start of this course. She stands out in her supportive nature as she would always say to me that I could call on her whenever I need her.
?
NETWORK MEMBER 2
Name: Dr. F
Title: Neonatologist/Chairman, University Hospital/Rutgers Medical School (Pediatrics)
Organization: University Hospital and Rutgers Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
Academic or Professional: Academic
Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse:
Notes:
Dr. F practices his work at the University Hospital and Rutgers Medical School, and he is deeply passionate about neonatal care. He is also willing to take up any challenge and is ready to teach nurses, medical students and faculty members about current trends in neonatal care. I have worked with him in the NICU for about 7 years and is always encouraging staff on their career advancement. He was a good resource person during my BSN program as he is always willing to help no matter the time. When I made up my mind to get into this program, I hinted him of it and all he could say is that I admire your courage by swinging from pediatrics/newborn nurse to psychiatry of this magnitude. Each time he sees me, he will ask me how I am getting along and assured of his willingness to assist and support me whenever I call on him.
NETWORK MEMBER 3
Name: American Psychiatric Nurses Association
Title: N/A
Organization: American Psychiatric Nurses Association
Academic or Professional: Professional
Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse:
Notes:
This organization is a professional body that is more suited to my chosen field of study, that is being a Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner. Their core values align well with mine, and their educational services prove to be both advancing and efficient.
Reference: https://www.apna.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3277
NETWORK MEMBER 4
Name: Dr. Patrick
Title: FPMHNP-BC, APN
Organization: Family Mental Health Service LLC
Academic or Professional: Professional
Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse:
Notes:
I selected this individual because of his leadership school. He is organized and coordinated and manages to keep his temper despite the amount of pressure he endures at his workplace. He also is a good listener and was very resourceful to me during my days of my BSN. He takes his time when working and is very dedicated to his work, no matter how tight his schedule is.
I am certain that this is going to be a good resource to me during my academic journey to becoming a mental health practitioner.
ADDITIONAL NETWORK MEMBERS
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
My Academic and Professional Network |
My Academic and Professional Network