New Deal and Its Critics Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
I’m studying for my History class and need an explanation.
Mod 7 Assignment: The New Deal and its critics
1010 unread replies.1010 replies.
This assignment asks you to use the videos featured this week, as well as our textbook, to discuss and evaluate Roosevelt’s New Deal response a little further. Regardless of whether you agree politically with the New Deal, there are lessons to take from this interesting and desperate era.
Assignment Instructions
Step 1: Assess the primary source images in the link below.
Take a look at the charts, images, and cartoons featured on this webpage (Links to an external site.).
Skim through these images about the FDR’s New Deal. Was everyone a fan of New Deal programs?
How was the New Deal redefining political definitions like “liberalism” (‘classic liberalism’ meant a hands-off government that stays out of people’s paths to “life, liberty, and property,” but not so with this new brand)? Fear not, we will discuss the changing definitions of “conservatism” in the decades after World War II shortly.
For now, recall from last week that political “conservatives” tended to be those with interests in fewer regulations for Big Business (like the pro-business Republican party), as well as Christian fundamentalists. Keep in mind, though, that Christian fundamentalists existed in large numbers on both sides of the political spectrum– I present William Jennings Bryan as the prime example; he was a Populist-backed Democrat with a progressive view of society and reform, the anti-war vice-president for Woodrow Wilson who resigned upon US entry into WWI, AND the Christian fundamentalist who argued for the prosecution in the famous case against the teacher (Scopes) who taught evolution in a public classroom. My point being: do not try to apply today’s modern party politics to this era, it simply does not work.
Step 2: Reply to Prompt
USING THIS WEEK’S VIDEOS AND IMAGES (INCLUDING THE VIDEO FROM THE READING CHECK), RESPOND TO THE PROMPT BELOW IN A 150- TO 250-WORD DISCUSSION POST. NO FORMAL CITATIONS NECESSARY, BUT DO REFERENCE THE SOURCES TO SUPPORT YOUR IDEAS. YOU DON’T HAVE TO ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS, JUST THE ONES THAT GET YOU WRITING.
Prompt: Assess President Roosevelt’s response to the Great Depression, namely his First and Second New Deals. What Populist or other progressive influences do you think played a role in FDR’s idea for the New Deal? What were the major criticisms of President Roosevelt’s New Deal policies? Why were some people against the legislation passed by Congress and the President under the New Deal? Consider the Supreme Court’s repeal of New Deal programs. How did the New Deal change the role of government during the 1930s? How did President Franklin D. Roosevelt redefine American freedom by the end of the decade? What lessons from the Great Depression and New Deal attempts to ease American suffering are useful to us today?
Step 3: Reply to Two (2) Peers
- In a short paragraph between 50 and 100 words, add further supporting details or respectfully disagree with the post’s author using evidence from this week’s readings.
- Respond to as many peers as you like, but you must respond to at least two coursemates.
Please reply to two peers who do not yet have replies so that all are included in the conversation.
How to participate:
A few tips for this assignment:
- Press “Reply” to add your own, individual reply to the discussion board.
- To reply to your peers’ posts, press reply under their specific post.
- Coursemates’ posts will become visible once you have posted to the discussion board.
- For discussion assignments, it is recommended that you compose your posts in a word processor so that you can copy and paste into your discussion posts. BE AWARE: There is no Save function for discussion posts.
- If you need further assistance, consider the following tutorials from the Canvas Student Guides earmarked here under “Discussions (Links to an external site.)“.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!