Organizational Structure And Leadership
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions
Organizational Structure And Leadership
Organizational Structure and Leadership
Consider the differences between these two law enforcement agencies: Sheriff Andy Griffith and his two-man Mayberry sheriff’s office, and the 35,000-officer New York City Police Department. (If you’ve never heard of Andy, take a quick Internet interlude.) Both agencies have the same mission—keeping the peace. However, could Andy Griffith walk the streets of New York unarmed and talk his way into keeping the city safe? Would a riot-gear-equipped NYPD SWAT team be the best way to keep the peace in Mayberry?
Whether an organizational structure is hierarchical or organic, the culture of a law enforcement agency comes from the top. In this assignment, you will examine environmental factors and devise the most appropriate organizational structure, defend your choice, and explain how the structure you have devised would best perform the mission of keeping peace in the community. Scenario:
Bayside Village has undergone rapid change in the last ten years. Once a summer vacation getaway of seaside cottages and boutique shops, Bayside’s economy suffered when the auto plant in neighboring Metro City closed. Now Bayside is a city in transition as lower-income residents of diverse ethnic backgrounds have moved in and the original residents have relocated to more vibrant cities farther down the coast. Originally a sleepy village of 1,500, Bayside now has a population approaching 10,000.
1. Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
2. Read the following from the textbook, Criminal Justice Organizations Administration and Management:
a. Chapter 2, “Structure of Criminal Justice Organizations”
b. Chapter 3, “The Criminal Justice System in Its Environment”
3. Using Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 as a guide, write a paper:
a. Briefly (in one or two paragraphs) discuss the characteristics of the hierarchical organizational structure and the organic organizational structure.
b. Discuss the environmental factors at issue in the Bayside Village scenario.
c. Then, placing yourself as the newly appointed chief of the Bayside Village Police Department, devise an organizational structure for the Bayside PD, assuming the following:
i. You have 28 patrolmen ranging from veterans of the “old” Bayside Village to new graduates of the state law enforcement training academy. Two of the patrolman-rank officers are detectives.
ii. You also have four sergeants and one lieutenant.
iii. A central dispatch agency handles 9-1-1. It does not report to the chief of police, but you have two civilian clerks.
d. Describe in detail the type of structure you have chosen and the reasons you feel this structure is the preferred organizational structure for the Bayside Village Police Department. Include the advantages of your structure the disadvantages of adopting another structure.
e. Lastly, indicate how the structure you selected is more conducive to leadership as opposed to merely management in the Bayside Village Police Department.
4. Deliverable:
a. A two- to three-page paper, double-spaced, 12-pt. type
b. An organizational chart
i. You can create the organizational chart in Word or PowerPoint
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!