Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
1. Essay #2 Assignment and Outline
Find the instructions for the essay #2 assignment in the module. The essay outline is due this Friday, November 27, at 4:30 p.m. Like last time, you need to fill in the outline template provided.
We will follow the two-step submission process again–submit to the dropbox and the bethann.wiersma@lambtoncollege.ca Make sure the subject line of your email reads Your Name, Essay 2 Outline, 04. Additionally, it would help me if you would name your document in the following way: Your Name Essay 2 outline
2. Article pairs
This essay is based on pairs of articles. Those articles are posted to the module. Reminder–if you wrote your last essay on one of these articles, you may not choose that pair.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53477121
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/opinion-make-mask-wearing-a-sign-of-personal-strength-not-weakness-lives-depend-on-it
Use the following outline format to plan your essay; copy and paste this template into a new document:
INTRODUCTION
A. Grabber (point form: grab the readers attention, related to the topic)
B. Introductory Ideas: (point form general statement about the topic/argument)
Here is an example: For the last few years/months, _____ has been a daily topic in the news.
C. Thesis Statement: (full sentence: two sides of the argument but favouring one)
Ive read X and Y, and Im inclined to agree most with X because of her
BODY
A. BRIEF summaries of articles highlighting the authors main arguments (point form with proper lead in/s)
PICK TWO OR THREE THEMES TO COMPARE/CONTRAST. HERE ARE SOME IDEAS:
B. Topic Sentence (statement on the authors tone/voice)
Tone/voice — Article A
Tone/voice Article B
C. Topic Sentence (statement on authors support/backing)
Support Article A
Support Article B
D. Topic Sentence(statement on authors audiences)
Audience Article A
Audience Article B
E: Other ideas to consider are the authors calls to action, the articles final verdicts, the articles emotional impacts, the authors biases
CONCLUSION
A. Refer to Thesis: state which article you would tend to favour based on comparisons
Because of X, Y, and Z, I am more likely to fall in line with X for these reasons. She is backed by _________, keeps people my age at the forefront, blah, blah, blah
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |