Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
PHE4055 Planning and Evaluation of Public Health
Week 4 ProjectAssignment Task: Complete this assignment by submitting it. The deadline is June 28 at 11:59 p.m. Evaluation of the Process
A health program’s inputs and outputs are measured through process evaluation. Investigate the concept of process evaluation of a health program using the South University Online Library or the Internet. Make a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document with the following information:
An investigation into the idea of process evaluation. Consider the reasons for the importance of process evaluation and the situations in which it is particularly useful.
A description of the steps involved in evaluating a process.
Give examples of the different kinds of program data that should be included in a process evaluation.
The ways in which inputs to the organizational plan and inputs to the services utilization plan are quantified are examined and described.
Specifics of the submission:
SU PHE4055 W4 Project LastName FirstInitial.doc is the name of the document.
Give examples to back up your points.
Use the APA citation style to cite any sources.
By the due date, submit your document to the Submissions Area.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
PHE4055 Planning and Evaluation of Public Health |
PHE4055 Planning and Evaluation of Public Health