Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Physiology Urinalysis Graphs and Summary Paper
Part I: Create four separate graphs based on the data obtained from Canvas:
Specific Gravity vs. Time (line graph: use data for all groups)
Urine Volume vs. Time (cumulative line graph: use data for all groups) Note: you will have to add the urine volumes together to obtain the cumulative volume (e.g. the cumulative volume at 60 minutes would be the sum of the individual volumes at 20 minutes + 40 minutes + 60 minutes)
Physiology Urinalysis Graphs and Summary Paper
Urine Production Rate vs. Time (line graph: use data for all groups)
% return (bar graph: only 500 ml and 1000 ml water loading groups)
On each graph include the data supplied by the other groups. (See Canvas)
Add a title to each graph
Label each group with a distinct symbol
Provide a legend for your graph
Make sure you label your axes with the correct units (i.e. “Time (minutes)”, “Urine volume (ml)” and “Urine Production Rate (ml/minute).” (Note: Specific gravity has no units)
Part II: Graph summary paragraphs for each of the four graphs.
Part III: Submit the four graphs and summary paragraphs as a single document (PDF, Google doc, or Word file) using the submission link in this module.
Physiology Urinalysis Graphs and Summary Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Physiology Urinalysis Graphs and Summary Paper