POL 310 Week 3 E Waste Prevention Policy Options Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
POL 310 Week 3 E Waste Prevention Policy Options Discussion
Reflect: Electronic waste (e-waste) has become a serious problem for many communities and for many agencies tasked with the proper disposal of this type of material. Not all e-waste materials are useless or dangerous waste because much of the electronic equipment or parts that have been discarded can be safely reused or recycled. Nevertheless, since most e-waste materials are complex electronic devices made from a wide variety of components, the risks these types of electronics pose to humans or our natural environment are growing. Simultaneously, the policy responses to these threats are not keeping up with the dynamic management challenges being created today. Accordingly, local, state, and federal policymakers face a plethora of dilemmas when trying to create effective policies regulating the proper disposal of hazardous e-waste.
Write: You will be assigned to research a specific e-waste policy option based on the first letter of your last name.
If your last name begins with A, B, C, or D, you must research e-waste prevention policy options.
If your last name begins with E, F, G, or H, you must research e-waste minimization policy options.
If your last name begins with I, J, K, or L, you must research e-waste reuse policy options.
If your last name begins with M, N, O, or P, you must research e-waste recycling policy options.
If your last name begins with Q, R, S, or T, you must research e-waste energy recovery policy options.
If your last name begins with U, V, W, X, Y, or Z, you must research e-waste disposal policy options.
POL 310 Week 3 E Waste Prevention Policy Options Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow