Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
I require answers to two of the four questions below (you choose which ones), in a typical five-paragraph essay with at least five citations each:
Consider the following statement: The Trump administration was correct to “terminate” the North American Free Trade Agreement in favor of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) for two reasons: greater environmental and labor safeguards. Explain why you agree or disagree with the statement.
Examine the claim: As global warming advances, there has been an increase in global trade in the Arctic, as well as increased competition among the Russians, Chinese, and Americans.
Examine the claim: Because of China’s assertiveness, Trump’s failure as president, and ASEAN’s economic shortcomings, President Biden was wise to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Allow for entrepreneurial or economic freedom, foreign capital investment with few protectionist laws, and domestic political liberalization, and watch as AUTHORITARIANS liberalize their economies and democratize their governments.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Politics in the United States and Around the World |
Politics in the United States and Around the World