Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Privacy of blockchain data assignment
Data is the most valuable asset in digital business models, necessitating greater knowledge of suitable privacy protection measures. The General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union is a result of the debates, and it now requires enterprises to guarantee that their information ecosystems are compliant with the law. Because blockchain technology promises to make a centralized data authority superfluous, there is currently a rising trend to apply blockchain technologies to business models that rely on data interchange. In this week’s research discussion, we’ll look at how some academics are attempting to provide insights that will assist decision-makers in selecting a blockchain configuration that conforms with data privacy legislative standards. The findings of the study might be used to evaluate any other blockchain architecture. By reading and evaluating the paper 20, this research debate will go into several facets of blockchain technology (attached).
Please read the article attentively and watch the videos (https://youtu.be/o-oTdYod8iU, https://youtu.be/IoH9fPWNRSc ) that discuss these difficulties. Then, in response to the following question, use other academic resources to supplement your discussions:
What is your overall opinion of the morphological box as a “data privacy assessment tool” for the Hyperledger Sawtooth blockchain configuration? Only 200 characters!
How promising is and will be the everyday application of blockchain technology? Only 200 characters!
Which method, in your opinion, is best for achieving an appropriate degree of personal data protection and is auditable? Why? There are only 100 words!
In addition to watching the video included in this week’s resources, the answers to the questions above require a thorough grasp of the article in question. Because this is a hot topic, there is a lot of research on which you can build your discussion.
NOTE: 1. Write a 700-800 word essay.
2. Respond to at least two posts from your peers’ discussions with at least two 400-450 word comments (replies).
3. Give credit to your sources (APA 7.0 ed).
4. A minimum of five references must be no more than three years old.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Privacy of blockchain data assignment