Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Instructions
The following are the course objectives:
CO3. Create a framework for forming one’s own moral and ethical philosophy.
Description:
The Week 7 Final Paper is a continuation of the Week 3 Paper Proposal Assignment and is the culmination of all of the ethical theories and philosophers we have studied in PHIL200. Take into account the following:
Please go over the instructions for the weeks 2 and 3 assignments once more.
At least half of the paper should be devoted to discussing the theory, after which you will use it to argue for or against a position on a current topic.
The length of the paper should be 1500 to 2000 words.
Please submit an MS Word or Word compatible document, double-spaced with one-inch margins, as an attachment (consider using one of the attached templates based on your chosen style, APA or MLA).
Please follow the citation guidelines set forth by your program of study. You do not need to annotate the reference page/bibliography, but you should have properly formatted in-text citations and a complete reference page.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Question of Moral and Ethical Philosophy |
Question of Moral and Ethical Philosophy