Rachel Botsman Case for Collaborative Consumption
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Question Description
PURPOSE
The purpose of this assignment is to critically think about economic levels.INSTRUCTIONS
If you haven’t already watch the video at right (or watch it again so it is fresh in your mind). Using the information you learned in your reading this week, think about how you would define a mezzo level and a macro level in the type of economy that Rachel Botsman presents. Then, write a substantive paper in approximately 500 words addressing the questions and criteria below. (Follow APA guidelines as is appropriate when citing and referencing sources.)For example, are there mezzo systems she has done away with due to the globalization of exchange?
Does her system consider everything to be a micro system since we access it individually and dont need to go through other systems to access the resources we need / want?
How would you define this global exchange in terms of systems theory?
Include in your paper:
An example of a micro system she addresses;
An example of a mezzo system she addresses;
An explanation of a macro system she addresses;
How are these boundaries blurred in the current economy as she explains it?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Rachel Botsman Case for Collaborative Consumption
Rachel Botsman Case for Collaborative Consumption