Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
For this essay, you are to choose ONE STORY FROM EACH column below and answer ONE PROMPT from the choices below the columns.
Be sure to write:
3-to-4-pages (~800-1000 words)
Using MLA-formatting
A creative title
An engaging introduction with a clear thesis (UNDERLINED AND BOLD FACED)
Which prompt you are answering or you will lose points
Fully developed and supported body ¶s
Using at least 2 quotes from each of your 2 texts, but no more than 3 per text
Parenthetical, MLA citations
A complete, concluding paragraph
Works Cited
COLUMN 1
The Grave
The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas
Bloodchild
Girl
COLUMN 2
My Lucy Friend Who Smells Like Corn
How to Tame a Wild Tongue
Brownies
Grandpas Story
Directions:
So many of the stories weve read these past few weeks treat similar themes, but perhaps handle them in different ways.
Weve discussed themes about:
Characters coming of age (maturing)
Scapegoats and sacrifices of the innocent
Sexism, gender biases, racism, economic classism
The nature and definitions of family
Gender roles (binaries or nonbinaries)
When youve selected the two stories and the theme you want to discuss, explore in depth how each story develops that theme, and how the stories are linked by their similarities or differences.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |