Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
T-Test on Data from Dayton and Montgomery County Public Health Website
Let’s revisit our data worksheet from Module two, where you ran a t-test on the data from the Dayton & Montgomery County Public
Health website.
In assignment 2.3, you were asked to compare means between the 2017 and 2018 data, and the 2018 and 2019 data. Although t-
tests are very useful when we are comparing two samples, ANOVAs are better utilized when we have more than two samples. The
video above can assist you in conducting an ANOVA for this data in Excel.
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Conduct an ANOVA in Excel using the data from the Dayton Public Health Website you previously gathered.
Be sure to label your output as ANOVA and submit your worksheet.
In a separate Word document, describe what your results say in a way that is easily digestible to an adult.
Submit your completed Excel worksheet and Word document. To submit your second document, click “Add Another File” under your
first file upload:
Links: https://www.mccoat.org/data-reports
Video:
T-Test on Data from Dayton and Montgomery County Public Health Website
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
T-Test on Data from Dayton and Montgomery County Public Health Website |
T-Test on Data from Dayton and Montgomery County Public Health Website