Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Here is the professor’s feedback on M1 and M2.
M1
This is extremely general and does not propose a narrowly focused argument research essay. You have no specific time period or specific area or specific act of racial violence. Review some of your sources and see what examples they use in regards to racial violence and then focus on a specific event that is of most interest to you
professor’s feedback on M1 and M2M2
All of your sources are from the past 18 months and they are all academic journal articles. Why did you not try to find other source types? Moreover, it is unclear if they are primary or secondary because of their publication date. It does not indicate if it was a long-term study and just happened to be published now. The Man and Spinner source appear to be primary sources.
Your annotations describe the source, but do not address the authors or how this will support your narrowly focused argument. These sources do look at racial violence, but there is not a narrow focus.
You failed to cite your sources correctly and completely in your preferred citation style – MLA, APA or Chicago. See attachments.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
The Professor’s Feedback on M1 And M2