The pros and cons of aluminum vs. copper wiring
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The pros and cons of aluminum vs. copper wiring
Aluminum and copper are two common materials used in electrical wiring. Here are some of the pros and cons of each:
Pros of aluminum wiring:
- Cheaper: Aluminum is less expensive than copper, making it a more affordable option.
- Lightweight: Aluminum is lighter than copper, which can make installation easier and reduce strain on structures.
- Corrosion-resistant: Aluminum is resistant to corrosion, which can make it a good choice in humid or coastal areas.
Cons of aluminum wiring:
- Higher resistance: Aluminum has a higher resistance than copper, which can lead to voltage drops and reduced energy efficiency.
- Not as ductile: Aluminum is not as ductile as copper, which means it is more likely to break or crack when bent or twisted.
- More susceptible to oxidation: Aluminum can oxidize more easily than copper, which can create a fire hazard if the oxide layer becomes thick enough.
Pros of copper wiring:
- Higher conductivity: Copper has a higher conductivity than aluminum, which means it can carry more electrical current with less voltage drop.
- More ductile: Copper is more ductile than aluminum, which means it is less likely to break or crack during installation.
- Less susceptible to oxidation: Copper is less susceptible to oxidation than aluminum, which can reduce the risk of a fire hazard.
Cons of copper wiring:
- More expensive: Copper is more expensive than aluminum, which can make it a less economical choice.
- Heavier: Copper is heavier than aluminum, which can make installation more difficult and put more strain on structures.
- Corrosion-prone: Copper can corrode in certain environments, such as in areas with high levels of moisture or salt in the air.
The pros and cons of aluminum vs. copper wiring
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow