Vulnerabilities at The Richmond International Airport
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Vulnerabilities at The Richmond International Airport
Airport Assessment Part 1 Instructions
You have been tasked to comprise a comprehensive analysis of all potential threats and vulnerabilities at the Richmond International Airport. This assessment should be conducted without consideration to, or analysis of, existing measures. This is your personal assessment based on your knowledge gained from the information in this course and any outside sources you locate (scholarly, governmental, or academic).
Make sure that you thoroughly review the website http://www.flyrichmond.com, as it provides significant information about the airport including a building plan, services, and map links. Note that south of the terminal building (at bottom of the screen on the Google map) is a cargo area for FedEx, etc. Make sure that assets such as these are included in your assessment. Consideration should be given to infrastructure impact at various levels.
Prepare a formal report on your findings. The report should follow strict APA guidelines and at least 4 sources must be properly cited. This report will include a qualitative analysis. As such, separate spreadsheets must be developed for the threats and vulnerabilities respectively. All resource elements should be presented and discussed. The report must consist of 900–1,400 words.
The outline of the report must include at a minimum:
- Introduction
[Provide a brief introduction outlining the purpose and scope of this report.]
- Security Stakeholders
[Identify the stakeholders for ensuring security, prevention, and risk management. Discuss interdependences, relationships, and legal requirements.]
- Descriptions of Assessments
- Threat Assessment
[Present the all identified threats and hazards. Explain the threat(s) listing all potentially affected resources. Organize threats as natural, accidental, and intentional or malicious.]
- Vulnerability Assessment
[Discuss the identified vulnerabilities. Use the following potential impact categories: Catastrophic, Critical, Limited, Minor, and Negligible. Develop appropriate definitions for each category. Similarly, definitions should be developed for the likelihood of occurrence using the following options: Highly Likely, Likely, Possible, Unlikely, and Remote/Rare. Do not assign weights or probabilities to each category. This will be addressed in the Part 2.]
- Summary
Summarize your findings. Do not make recommendations (this will be included in Part 2).
Unit 3 Individual Project 1
MACROBUTTON DoFieldClick Type your Name Here
American Intercontinental University
MACROBUTTON DoFieldClick Type your Paper Title
Project Type: MKTG340 Unit 3 Individual Project
MACROBUTTON DoFieldClick Date of Submission
Abstract
This is a single paragraph, no indentation is required. The next page will be an abstract; “a brief, comprehensive summary of the contents of the article; it allows the readers to survey the contents of an article quickly” (Publication Manual, 2010). The length of this abstract should be 35-50 words (2-3 sentences). NOTE: the abstract must be on page 2 and the body of the paper will begin on page 3.
MACROBUTTON DoFieldClick Type your Paper Title
Introduction
Remember to always indent the first line of a paragraph (use the tab key). The introduction should be short (2-3 sentences). The margins, font size, spacing, and font type (italics or plain) are set in APA format. While you may change the names of the headings and subheadings, do not change the font.
Part 1: Overview of Company
Introduce the concept and be sure to indent the first line of the paragraph. Using one of the companies you began developing in the Unit 2 Individual Project, create a story you wish to shop to a media outlet. Provide a brief overview of the company. Describe the media outlet being pitched. Include information on its target audience. (The media outlet must be real) Part 1 of the Individual Project should be 1 page in length. Be sure to cite your resources.
Part 1: Media Outlet and Target Audience
Introduce the concept and cite the resources DO NOT use the exact words… be sure to indent the first line of the paragraph.
Part 2: An Attention-Grabbing Opening
Introduce the concept and be sure to indent the first line of the paragraph. Part 2 of the Individual Project should be 2 1/2 pages in length.
Part 2: The Hook
Introduce the concept and be sure to indent the first line of the paragraph.
Part 2: Background Information Supporting The Pitch
Introduce the concept and be sure to indent the first line of the paragraph.
Part 2: Support Materials
Introduce the concept and be sure to indent the first line of the paragraph.
Part 2: The Action Step
Introduce the concept and be sure to indent the first line of the paragraph.
Part 3: Describe your Follow-up Plan
Introduce the concept and be sure to indent the first line of the paragraph.
Part 3: Discuss the Special Considerations for Pitching a Blogger.
Introduce the concept and cite the resources DO NOT use the exact words… be sure to indent the first line of the paragraph. This section of the paper must contain research – which means that a citation must be included in the section (Last name, year). The punctuation goes after the citation not at the end of the sentence. If no author is stated: (Short Title of Article, year). The punctuation goes after the citation not at the end of the sentence. Part 3 of the Individual Project should be 1 1/2 pages in length. Be sure to cite your resources.
Conclusion
Add some concluding remarks-can be a sentence or two.
References
NOTE: The reference list starts on a new page after your conclusion.
Vulnerabilities at The Richmond International Airport
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow