Who Likes to Be Reachable Article Discussion

October 7, 2022

Who Likes to Be Reachable Article Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Who Likes to Be Reachable Article Discussion

Write 400-to-500-word reflection about the readings and topic. Avoid summarizing the readings. Focus on reflecting on the reading. Demonstrate that you have thought critically about the readings and can apply it to your own life. The reading journal should have a coherent narrative, complete sentences, and proper grammar. Please cite anything being rephrased.

Here are some ideas for starting your reading journal.

What different arguments were made in this week’s readings. Do you believe the author’s arguments? Why or why not?

What common themes emerged from this week’s readings? Do these themes apply to your life or experiences? Why or why not?

Can you think an example from your own life that agrees or contradicts the findings of an article? How does this change the way we think about the readings?

How does the reading challenge what you know about interpersonal communication or social media?

What do you disagree with about this week’s readings? Why?

What are you struggling to understand about this week’s readings? What prompted this confusion?

Also ask a question at the end that you think can spark a discussion

You do not need to answer all of these questions, but you should demonstrate critical thinking about the readings and self-reflection on how the ideas presented in the readings apply to your life.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met