Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Answer the questions in their entirety. Cite the text using page numbers and videos with time stamps. NO OUTSIDE SOURCES.
Question 1) Martel describes how she came to make The Phantom of the Operator in the interview with Jim Supanick. What was something that stood out to you as interesting from their exchange?
Question 2) Susan Schuppli’s essay begins as a relatively straightforward account of the taping system in the Nixon White House, and the problem of 18 minutes of tape that was mysteriously erased in the wake of the Watergate scandal. As it develops, the essay offers a series of interesting reflections on silence, material witnessing, ghosts in the machine, and what she calls, “the sustained ‘miracle’ of potential ‘resurrection.'” Schuppli’s essay is more focused on the material qualities of archival materials than on the cultural or social resonances that come to the fore in The Phantom of the Operator. Nonetheless, her essay invites us to think more about how Martel foregrounds the material qualities of her found materials. What do you notice about the importance of sound, for example, in this process? Find a point of connection between something Schuppli writes and something you noticed about the way Martel’s film looks or sounds, and explain the link. Cite Schuppli’s essay and include a screen shot from The Phantom of the Operator to illustrate your response.
Question 3) Watch Our Nixon. How does the film work with the home movies shot by Nixon’s aides in a way that departs from what Martel is doing in The Phantom of the Operator? What are some of the more conventional aspects of documentary that appear in Our Nixon that Martel leaves aside? What are some of the inventive things that the film does with sound that distinguishes it from Martel’s approach to narration and sound design in The Phantom of the Operator?
Caroline Martel with Jim Supanick, “Unseen Voices”: UNSEEN VOICES: Caroline Martel WITH JIM SUPANICK The Brooklyn Rail
Our Nixon: Watch Our Nixon (2013) Full Movie Free Online Streaming | Tubi (tubitv.com)
(Links to an external site.How does the film work with the home movies shot by Nixon’s aides in a way that departs from what Martel is doing in The Phantom of the Operator? What are some of the more conventional aspects of documentary that appear in Our Nixon that Martel leaves aside? What are some of the inventive things that the film does with sound that distinguishes it from Martel’s approach to narration and sound design in The Phantom of the Operator?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |