Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
CSS332 Structured Query Language and Cross Site Scripting Threats
Continue with your Key Assignment by using the outline and draft that you created in last week, providing your final version of the assignment here by updating the Table of Contents and information.
Consider the two vulnerabilities: Structured query language (SQL) injection and cross-site scripting. Complete the following:
Provide an explanation of how the 2 breaches for both SQL and CXS occurred and if they were isolated to that market segment (manufacturing, telecom, finance, etc.: https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/vertical-market/).
Provide a brief explanation in your own words for what problems are caused by these vulnerabilities based on your 3 types from last week question.
Summarize the breaches in terms of the damage to the businesses and the specifics of the attacks.
What could have and should have been done to prevent the breaches?
What could have and should have been done to mitigate the resulting damage?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
CSS332 Structured Query Language and Cross Site Scripting Threats |
CSS332 Structured Query Language and Cross Site Scripting Threats