techniques for minimizing biases in judgements
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
techniques for minimizing biases in judgements
Description
Debiasing- Recognising people and finance biases in your own environment
Question 1
Identify and describe at least one bias that you might fall into when making judgements about people in your professional or personal life. In your answer, make sure that you clearly name the bias that you are referring to (e.g. overconfidence or hindsight bias). (Max. 150 words)
Start writing here:
Question 2
Identify and describe at least one bias that you might be prone to when engaging in your regular, work-related activities. In your answer, make sure that you clearly name the bias that you are referring to, and explain how the bias relates to the activity. (Max. 150 words)
Start writing here:
Question 3
Select and describe debiasing techniques you could use to address the biases identified in Questions 1 and 2. Be sure to clearly relate specific debiasing techniques (e.g. taking the outside view or considering the opposite) to the biases that you have identified. (Max. 150 words)
Start writing here:
techniques for minimizing biases in judgements
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow