Victim Services and Victim Advocacy Discussion Essay

March 3, 2022

Victim Services and Victim Advocacy Discussion Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Victim Services and Victim Advocacy Discussion Essay

Additional Guidelines for completing this 2 to 3-page discussion on Victim Services are as follows:

This mini-paper should be from 2 to 3 page long, double-spaced, and should integrate Chapter 2 and the ADDITIONAL ASSIGNED READINGS, as they apply to victim services and victim advocacy.

For this paper, explain what we mean by victim services. When doing so, be sure to include information on the ROLE OF THE VICTIM SERVICE PROVIDER and also be sure to discuss some of the actions when we engage in ADVOCACY TASKS FOR VICTIMS.

In addition, explain why you believe that this has been included as a component of the criminal justice system.

Briefly summarize the three political cultures Eleazar identifies. Then, choose a state from each culture and summarize their state & local tax structure found on the tax foundation website.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met